EXCLUSIVE: Arizona Sheriff Cites Flood of Border Agents Confirming Feds' No-Apprehension Policy

Like we say down South, there is more than one way to skin a cat. If you want to be able to report lower numbers of arrests at or near the border, don't make any. It doesn't actually do anything to decrease the number of criminals entering our Country, but it sure does make a good talking point for janet napalitano.

The job of a Border Patrol Agent is dangerous enough without the assholes make it even more difficult by forcing the agents to approach these people two or three times in the same day. It also doesn't help that the atf allows guns to flow freely into the regions south of our border.

It's all about politics people, nothing more. If the agents are forced to arrest fewer of these illegal scumbags, then obama and napalitano can claim that they are doing something. The tension eases and they can begin to bring up the amnesty issue again. It mind games and politics. Don't fall for it. They are liars and cheats.

They play on our fears and our sympathies. If they can't get one they go after the other.

I have no sympathy for illegal aliens, they should force reform in their own country instead of bankrupting ours...

By Jana Winter - FoxNews

An Arizona sheriff says he has been flooded with calls and emails of support from local and federal agents who back his claims that the U.S. Border Patrol has effectively ordered them to stop apprehending illegal immigrants crossing the U.S.-Mexican border.

“Upper management has advised supervisors to have agents ‘turn back South’ (TBS) the illegal aliens (aka bodies) they detect attempting to unlawfully enter the country … at times you even hear supervisors order the agents over the radio to 'TBS' the aliens instead of catching them,” one San Diego border agent wrote in an email to Cochise County Sheriff Larry Dever.

“This only causes more problems as the aliens, as you know, don't just go back to Mexico and give up. They keep trying, sometimes without 10 minutes in-between attempts, to cross illegally,” continued the email, which was among a number of communications to Dever reviewed by FoxNews.com. “This makes the job for agents more dangerous. Not only are the aliens more defiant, they also begin to feel like they can get away with breaking our federal laws.”

The email is one of more than 100 messages Dever said he received from active and retired Border Patrol agents and law enforcement officers from across the country. Many wrote of what they said was their own experience and first-hand knowledge of Border Patrol’s efforts to reduce apprehension numbers by making fewer arrests.

FoxNews.com first reported this month that Dever said several Border Patrol officials, including at least one senior supervisor, told him they had been directed to keep the number of border apprehensions down by chasing illegal immigrants back toward Mexico. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has recently cited a reduction in border apprehensions as evidence of an increasingly secure border.

Three days after FoxNews.com’s initial report, Border Patrol chief Michael Fisher sent a letter to Dever in which he denied the accusations and invited the sheriff on a ride-along with federal agents at border.

"That assertion is completely, 100 percent false," Fisher wrote in the letter. "That it comes from a fellow law enforcement official makes it especially offensive."

But accounts from law enforcement officials around the country continue to pour in supporting Dever and the conversations he says he had with Border Patrol officers, including at least one supervisor, about keeping arrest numbers down.

“This is nothing new, during my career with the border patrol, this was done regularly,” said another email to Dever reviewed by FoxNews.com. “By assigning agents to different tasks, locations, etc., the apprehensions can be increased or decreased dramatically,” wrote Dan McCaskill Jr., a retired Border Patrol agent who worked in the Anti-Smuggling Unit.

And it goes on... Read the rest at the link above...

Playing Beanbag In Mexico

Can you imagine being a Border Patrol Agent and being ordered to go up against heavily armed drug smugglers with non-lethal beanbags? I can't. It's stupid, and it's dangerous.

Who ever ordered this should have to spend some quality time in the Arizona desert with some non-lethal rounds themselves. The job of a Border Patrol Agent has to be tough enough with a real weapon. Especially when the bad guys are being supplied weapons by another United States government agency, but that's a different story.

You can bet that Agent Brian Terry wasn't real thrilled with the order to use beanbags on drug running scumbags. That order probably cost him his life. I wonder if the guy who gave those orders feels it was worth it now? I hope not, good Border Patrol Agents aren't easy to find, and even harder to lose...

By John Hayward - Human Events

Who ordered the use of non-lethal weapons on the border?

Border Patrol agent Brian Terry and a team of fellow agents were patrolling Peck Canyon, on the Mexican border with Arizona, on the night of December 14, 2010. The team was on the trail of bandits who had been preying on illegal immigrants. Peck Canyon is a hotspot for smuggling activity.

Shortly before midnight, the team spotted a party of armed men crossing the border illegally. Their weapons included AK-47 assault rifles. The Border Patrol agents ordered these men to drop their weapons, but they refused.

Agent Terry’s team reacted to the invaders’ refusal to disarm by firing bean bags at them.

The invaders returned fire with hot lead, killing Agent Brian Terry. The Border Patrol switched to live ammunition, and killed one of the alien gunmen in the resulting firefight.

The government has strenuously denied that Border Patrol agents were instructed to use non-lethal weapons first. HSToday, the in-house newsletter of the Department of Homeland Security, ran a piece on December 30 that dismissed talk of bean bag guns as “increasingly bizarre Internet-fueled rumors.” An official from Customs and Border Protection issued a statement “to assist in dispelling the rumor.”

The piece goes out of its way to slam former Congressman Tom Tancredo of Colorado for keeping the bean bag story alive. Tancredo maintains that “[Homeland Security secretary] Napolitano and Border Patrol management are trying to hide” the fact that Agent Terry and his team were “under standing orders to always use non-lethal bean bag rounds first before using live ammunition.” He claims to have heard this directly from Border Patrol agents speaking off the record.

As government denials go, this one is extra-murky, with a side order of deniability. The CBP statement quoted by HSToday “personnel are trained to use the minimum force necessary to affect an arrest,” but they are also “trained and prepared for all situations and all threats and may deploy with less-lethal munitions as an option. Less-lethal munitions are not meant as a replacement for ‘live’ ammunition. All personnel performing in a law enforcement capacity are equipped with standard issue equipment, which includes a handgun.” None of which addresses the question of whether they were ordered to use non-lethal weapons first, under all circumstances… and if so, where that order originated.

Agent Terry’s chapter of the Border Patrol Council added that “reports circulating that Agent Terry and others were armed only with bean bag rounds and rubber bullets… were not true.” That’s never been the issue. Obviously they had real guns, because they killed one of the invaders in the firefight, and he didn’t go down with a ninja throwing star buried in his forehead.

Terry’s brother Kent told the Arizona Star that he finds the official government story deeply puzzling. “You go up against a bandit crew that is carrying AKs, and you walk out there with guns loaded with beanbags… I don’t get it,” he said, adding that Border Patrol agents “are professionals” who should “be able to use their judgment call on their own.”

Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry served three years in the Marine Corps, and worked as a cop in Michigan for a couple of years after that. It seems extraordinarily unlikely that his “judgment call” for dealing with people lugging automatic rifles, on a night when he was tracking a gang of violent thieves, would have been to load his weapon with teddy bear guts. It’s much more plausible that someone imposed that protocol upon him. The kind of person who would declare passengers subduing a bomber on board an airplane in flight meant “the system worked” is the kind of person I would view as a likely suspect.

President Obama had a meeting with Mexican president Felipe Calderon yesterday, discussing the recent murder of Immigration and Customs agent Jaime Zapata in Mexico, and said he views American agents Mexico are “advisers” who should obey “laws in place in Mexico that say our agents should not be armed.” A newsflash for this terrifyingly oblivious President: our agents are being gunned down on the American side of that border. Mexico is a failed state whose incompetent and corrupt government is losing a battle against drug lords. It is a war zone, and any American agent who goes anywhere near it should go in hot. I strongly suspect Agent Brian Terry knew that.